| Current Mood (Click, Play Loud) |
If you are unfamiliar with a network effect, it's when the value of a product, service or platform increases just because the number of users has also increased. Examples include influencers getting new traffic because they already were already showing traffic spikes, e-commerce sites gaining market share from word of mouth by past customers, or delivery and transportation services becoming more effective for providers and customers when there are more providers and customers.
Network effects aren't new to the digital age. When the majority of people have a weekend or holiday off, that's a network effect for travel, hospitality, and so on. When brands achieve mass awareness, the chance of a franchisee having success in a new market is higher; so are the fees. Religious faiths are much more likely to gain tolerance from governments when they are mass, not niche. Any network effect that you have become used to, like any other privilege, seems like second nature or the rules of the road.
But the roads are changing, sometimes faster than you might guess.
As a marketer, you are always looking for clients that can scale without sacrifice, because they allow you to fully realize wins without customer service issues. There are few things in this career worse than having to pull back from a winning practice due to forces beyond your control, so the past 20+ years of marketing life has been mostly in the service of digital enterprises.
But the pursuit of these goals has caused the end of other network effects, and that's only speeding up with the advent of worldwide economies and artificial intelligence. Marketing campaigns that used to be able to rely and benefit from offline channel brand awareness increasingly, well, can't. Live events are cut and shared on the preferred schedule of the individual. Songs are not as well known, movies not as well seen, stories don't resonate, and so on.
What this means to the society is incredibly wide ranging, and the challenges it leads to are equally varied. If everyone's cultural intake is tailored to the individual, it's a small step to only seeing the "news" and opinions that one already has reflected back to them, because anything that isn't that won't work on the math. Since new things are harder to like than old, nostalgia plays dominate, or at the very least, inspire highly derivative ones. Intellectual humility and doubt -- I might be wrong and it might be good news because that's where learning and growth occurs -- are seen as untenable. Pushback to a time with stronger networks existed can lead to rises in nativism, because nativism and nostalgia are often closely linked.
Backing this up to real world implications for marketing and business people... I used to work in retargeting for an adtech company. What most vendors wanted to do was to simply show the customer the individual SKU(s) that they had previously viewed for as long as the cookie data would allow, which was typically 30 days. We'd do tests in which we'd run these repetitive stalking ads against other plays, and the other plays would do better on engagement... but not direct and proven sales. So instead of doing the complicated and human thing, clients would often just stay simple and mechanical. Similar efforts to optimize spends to short-term payoffs led to rises in search and email programs, and cuts to branding and sponsorships.
What this misses is plain to anyone who has had to try to restock a funnel after a rush season; no mid to long-term leads in the funnel. That may be fine for products with a short buying cycle or fast exit plan, but that's not the majority of human endeavors.
I used to think that this was a market opportunity, and position mid-funnel metrics and awareness as a fertile ground for insights. Perhaps it still will be in a time of mature, rather than nascent, AI. But while we wait and hope and continue to strive to add value beyond all or nothing outcomes, the engines of this change seem focused on, well, all or nothing outcomes. Often tied to consumer categories that don't seem to drive any benefit to anyone but the owner of the category.
Keeping this on the positive, what it means is that your strong practices -- dayparting, frequency, execution -- need back testing more than ever. Seasonality assumptions may no longer be correct, if they are known at all.
And intellectual humility, which is often missing from junior marketers and the technology they are overly reliant on?
The strongest practice of all.