Sunday, August 14, 2016

Leave of Absence

Vegasy
If writing is a muscle -- and, well, it is -- it's something of an understatement to say that I am pretty well developed.

This blog now has over 200 posts to its credit. My music blog (what, you didn't know I have a music blog? It's about my old rock band, which just might play again one of these days) has another 30 posts, just in the past few months. The sports blog has another (gulp) 5,825 in the past decade, and counting

Before I made those blogs, I've written four books, wrote for dozens of clients and start-ups, and have pretty much paid the bills with words for my adult life. There's also four different social media feeds.

Way too many words, really.

Writing isn't just what I do for a living. It's how I define myself. The process is how I unwind at the end of most days, how I share and remember what I've learned, and how I give meaning to it all.

And, well, I've got to give it up.

Not all of it, of course. You might not even notice the drop in output, or might even be happy for less. But personal circumstances (an injury to my spouse that is going to require surgery and several months of rehab. a sudden outbreak of a summer cold that's completely knocked me sideways), combined with professional and personal commitments, are going to make certain sacrifices in terms of time served inevitable.

Besides, the clients (always) come first. And if you are really in the market for more of my words, you are more than welcome to go read more of them. They just won't all be about marketing and advertising.

Back in a bit!

* * * * *

Feel free to comment, as well as like or share this column, connect with me on LinkedIn, or email me at davidlmountain at gmail dot com, or hit the RFP boxes at top right. RFPs are always free, and we hope to hear from you soon.

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Four Indispensable Strategies to Increase E-mail Open Rates

Let's Get Open
(Wrote this one for the day gig, folks. You can see it live in the corporate wild here.)

Raising your open rates is a constant concern for many marketing managers in pharma and a prime focus of what we do at MNG Direct. Here are four abiding strategies that help us deliver results.

1) To go three steps forward, you might need to take one step back.

 Here’s a quick hypothetical scenario. You are running a simple A/B creative test for an e-mail campaign, which means you are splitting the list in half and making a single change so you can measure the impact of that decision. Rank the three outcomes below in order of preference.

a) Creative A performs 8% better than average, Creative B performs 4% worse

b) Creative A performs 28% worse than average, Creative B performs 15% better

c) Creative A performs 22% better than average, and Creative B performs 21% better

The answer is (drumroll please!)…B, then A, and then C.

That may seem counterintuitive, because we all want winners, and we’re leaving the two biggest ones on the sideline…but the problem with the results from Group C is that there’s no variation in the performance that you can use to inform future creative. When your work all performs the same, or is within a range where confidence from statistical significance is low, you do not have the information you need to make optimal choices for the next execution.

So, to sum up – when testing, go for bold single changes in test cells, made without fear. Learn from every test, and test whenever possible. It’s vital.

2) Counterpunch the clock with data.

 One of the most common questions in this industry is, when is the optimal time and day of the week to send e-mail? The problem is the question does not have a simple answer, because your e-mail does not hit the in-box in a vacuum.

Let’s imagine that you get a concrete answer – Monday at 8:30 am – and that it actually is the best time to send. This finding most likely came from data or a test and will become known by other e-mail professionals. Keep in mind that your healthcare professionals (HCPs) probably also subscribe to content newsletters, get notification e-mails from e-commerce vendors, and likely sift through dozens, if not hundreds, of e-mails in a day. So how many of these communications will wind up showing up in their in-boxes on Monday at 8:30 am? Probably too many for yours to really stand out.

At MNG Direct, we’ve seen consistent wins from dayparting in a more varied and granular approach, by category, click-through destination, frequency, and so on. This lets us generate a personalized plan for our flights and creates an atmosphere where we are continually learning. As a bonus, it also means that we are never overly dependent on a single time and day slot.

3) Mobile is more of a mindset than a platform. It’s also dominant.

 Many design professionals go for responsive coding in their e-mails to ensure smooth deployment in mobile handsets, and then they consider the job done. This leaves a lot of engagement on the table.

When an HCP is viewing your e-mail on a handset, it’s more than just a smaller screen that you have to worry about, more scrolling than on a desktop or laptop, or a different direction in panning. Dayparting is also a major consideration, since many HCPs are smartphone users who extend their accessibility beyond traditional business hours, and they may also not be willing or able to spend mobile bandwidth on high data transfers. With up to three out of every four people filtering for later or accessing e-mail content directly through mobile, your mindset needs to be mobile first, not mobile friendly. (As a final point on this, you also should be looking at your work on a variety of screens and monitoring how that display mix changes over time.)

4) Prioritize your testing levers.

 In every e-mail campaign, there are a number of variable choices that can have an impact on open rates. Sender names, subject lines, dayparting, preheaders, and preview pane creative elements are all in play, and that’s independent of more technical aspects like in-boxing to avoid the junk folder, hard and soft bounces, list hygiene, ISP white-listing, avoiding spam “honeypots,” and so on. Stay in the space long enough and you’ll wind up with winning and losing practices in all of the above, along with a sense of optimal practices, hopefully through test cell data.

But while all of these tactics have the ability to spike engagement metrics in different ways, they don’t have the same impact. Subject lines and sender names appear to all users, and dayparting also has universal impact. Getting deeper, preheaders and preview pane elements only have impact to the subset of users that are in a consideration path, but they can make all of the difference in the right placement, especially if you are looking to optimize beyond opens. As always, the data should drive your decision-making process.

Next Steps

While open rates may be the primary point of concern for most e-mail professionals, at MNG Direct, we take a more nuanced view, and we monitor a host of other metrics. That’s because any single e-mail metric, even one as important as open rate, will not give you the full indication of a campaign’s performance.

For instance…if your campaign has high opens but poor deliverability and high unsubscribes, that’s not a successful campaign. Similarly, a high click rate e-mail might sound great, but not if the opens are low, or if there are very few conversions on a landing page. Seasonality will also have an impact, and seeing how all of these metrics perform in relation to each other, over multiple flights, is also important.

Increasing your open rate is a laudable goal. But it shouldn’t be your only goal.

* * * * *

Feel free to comment, as well as like or share this column, connect with me on LinkedIn, or email me at davidlmountain at gmail dot com, or hit the RFP boxes at top right. RFPs are always free, and we hope to hear from you soon.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Making Money In Politics

Probably Not In Loose Bills
Like many people who do topical content, I'm really tired of feeling compelled to write about politics, especially Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for President... but, well, when things that have never happened before happen, it's pretty much impossible to not have it sneak into your work and thoughts. Especially as it relates to marketing and advertising.

The hype du jour comes from a seeming ad lib in which the candidate either implied about the assassination of his opponent, or was alluding to the political power of Second Amendment enthusiasts. And for the purpose of this column, it doesn't really matter about our opinion of the tactic, since it achieved the goal of "earned" media -- which is to say, a carrying of the news cycle.

The fact that this doesn't seem to be translating into votes -- at least, according to the various polls and trending analysis -- doesn't seem to be having that much impact on the candidate's fund raising, which pulled in $51 million in June, and $80 million in July... but with almost none of that cash going to TV ads. According to Business Insider, the Trump campaign has even been outspent by third-party candidates Gary Johnson (Libertarian) and Jill Stein (Green).

Which leads me to wonder... well, what is the campaign spending the money on, since the single biggest expense of a presidential campaign is typically television ads?

As I write this, there are 91 days, or 13 weeks, left until the voters put this thing out of our collective misery. Historically in America, elections reach another level of hype and awareness to casual voters after Labor Day, but as you might have guessed by now, this isn't a typical election, if for no other reason that both major party principals have been very well-known public figures for decades. Minds are being made in the here and now, and media buying being what it is, it seems increasingly likely that the Trump campaign just isn't terribly concerned with reaching ad parity, at least not on television, or against the benefit of keeping campaign costs down.

This isn't without some minor and recent historical precedent. In 2004, John Kerry kept eight figures of revenue in reserve past Election Day for a legal challenge that never came, as the campaign said they were worried about a repeat of the Florida hanging chad experience. (A claim that, frankly, didn't pass the smell test, since it's not as if donors wouldn't have been energized by that news.)

But that campaign followed a typical media buying pattern, including extensive advertising in the primaries. Trump's approach has been to dominate programming, either with call-in interviews or created controversies.

And so long as we all play along -- which makes me really worry about what's coming down the pike to count as more noteworthy than what we've already seen -- it seems the candidate is content to let the Democrats control the paid air channel.

Partisan advocates note the increasing ineffectiveness of paid media, or how much social is driving the conversation now. Trump has also been highly active in banner , but I have a slightly different question to ask.

What if the entire exercise is just, well, to collect contributions... that the candidate is under no obligation to spend? Or return?

* * * * *

Feel free to comment, as well as like or share this column, connect with me on LinkedIn, or email me at davidlmountain at gmail dot com, or hit the RFP boxes at top right. RFPs are always free, and we hope to hear from you soon.